Firstly, outdoor activities are important for children’s physical health. When children play outside, they run, jump, and move their bodies, which helps them stay fit and strong. Regular physical activity can prevent obesity and other health problems. In contrast, playing computer games usually means sitting in one place for a long time, which can cause eye problems, poor posture, and lack of exercise.

Secondly, outdoor play helps children develop social skills. When children play games like football or hide-and-seek, they learn how to communicate, share, and work as a team. They also learn how to solve problems and handle small conflicts with others. On the other hand, computer games are often played alone. Even online games do not provide the same level of real communication as face-to-face interaction. However, some people argue that computer games can improve skills such as quick thinking and problem-solving. This is true to some extent, especially for educational games. Nevertheless, too much screen time can make children addicted and reduce their interest in real-life activities.

In conclusion, although computer games have some benefits, I believe that outdoor activities are much better for children’s overall development. Parents should encourage children to spend more time playing outside while limiting screen time.

On one hand, free university education can give equal opportunities to everyone. Many talented students come from poor families and cannot afford high tuition fees. If education is free, these students can improve their skills and contribute to society. Moreover, an educated population helps the country grow economically and socially.

On the other hand, making university education completely free can be a heavy burden on the government. Universities require a lot of money to maintain good facilities, pay teachers, and support research. If students pay some fees, universities can improve the quality of education. In addition, when students pay for their education, they may take their studies more seriously and work harder to succeed.A better solution could be a mixed system. The government can support students from low-income families by offering scholarships or reduced fees, while other students pay a reasonable amount. This way, education remains accessible, and the quality of universities is maintained.

In conclusion, although free education has many advantages, I believe students should share some of the cost. This balanced approach benefits both students and society.